|
|
|
|
What the Future
Holds for Miss International Miss International was once a glorious beauty pageant
with a huge following. It enjoyed prestige and timeless beauties once graced
it. Now, faced with various threats, the pageant is on the brink decay. Is it
really or is it something that some quarters would like us to believe?
The 1960 edition: the first ever winners |
|
|
|
|
|
Where it all began Miss
International traces its origins in The pageant
thrived in |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
The peak of success There is no
doubt that Miss International is a prestigious pageant with a clear platform.
During its heyday, the pageant is a favorite among the Japanese and used to draw
very large crowd. Top class women once graced the pageant and still attract
top caliber women. For example, Dayanara Torres
before she went on to capture the Miss Universe crown was once a finalist at
the pageant. The pageant
was hosted by top Japanese presenters and was graced by great personas in
Japanese society. TV ratings were encouraging and sponsorships were providing
adequate revenue. Miss
International also proved to be a distinct pageant with a different trend. Although
it recognized |
|
|
Miss international 1992 finalist: Miss
Universe 1993 winner |
|||
|
|
|
The decline Last year, only
53 women representing their respective countries participated in the pageant.
This is the lowest turn-out for a major pageant. In comparison, Miss Universe
attracted 86 delegates, Miss World welcomed 104 delegates and Miss Earth got
82 participants. I vs U The trend
is that the Japanese attention shifted from Miss Japan International to Miss
Japan-Universe pageant. More so that now There are
also contrasting priorities. Miss Japan International pageant attracts more
demure Japanese women. Miss Japan-Universe on the other hand is looking for a
bon vivant woman. In short, one is
traditional and the other is modern and it seems that Miss Japan-Universe
proved that it is more attune with the times. Less
interest on Miss Japan International meant less interest on Miss
International. It is no coincidence that the pageant is experimenting on PR Trouble Last year’s
Miss International was also barely covered by the media. Even Missosology.Org
failed to extensively cover the event in contrast with what happened in the
2005 edition. It seems that in Even before
that, the pageant is not friendly to foreign media. The language used in the
pageant for example is Japanese signifying the fact that it is concentrating
more on the domestic market – a market where it is now losing ground. The
pageant therefore could not be beamed live across the world. The MTQI issue Of course,
the supposed quiet decline of Miss International is something that other
upstart and wannabe beauty pageants would like to cheer about.
Globalbeauties.com for example is using its popularity in busily promoting
the Miss Tourism Queen International (MTQI) despite the fact that it only
covered the pageant last year. The website is also suggesting that MTQI will
be included as one of the top pageants. It was learned however by Missosology that Globalbeauties.com founder Henrique Fontes sat as one of
the judges at MTQI while he is also the national director of the pageant in The issue
is an emphatic fact that upstart and never-heard pageants are willing to flex
their muscles just to gain to prestige. Such move can indeed endanger Miss
International. Miss
International of course is way beyond MTQI when it comes to prestige. Miss
International for example can bank to its rich history. The public perception
is also a good measure. For example, the 2005 victory of Precious Lara Quigaman at Miss International 2005 received wide public
and media attention in the |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
This year and beyond Is Miss International
struggling to stay alive? Maybe. The number of participating countries is a
good measure. However, the 2007 edition is quite promising. Priscila Perales of As
mentioned, Miss
International no doubt is still a beauty pageant with prestige but like any
organization, it is can experience its low point too. If anything, the
pageant is not as bad as what others would like us to think. |
|
|
Waving goodbye at the 2006 edition |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|